Subject: Re: [boost] [smart ptr] Any interest in copy-on-write pointer for C++11?
From: Pyry Jahkola (pyry.jahkola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-10 05:27:56
On 2013-02-09 18:47:59 +0000, Andreas Pfaffenbichler said:
> a heavy argument for a 'COW' pattern is made here:
> ( 'copy_on_write' class template included).
I was going to reply about the same, but here's the whole class with
> maybe it could be interesting to compare your 'cow_ptr' to this
The biggest difference and, in my opinion, the most important advantage
in favour of adobe::copy_on_write is that the copying is explicit;
you can only use
x->const_member(); // no refcount overhead even if x is non-const
to access const members of T. Whenever you need to modify the instance,
you'll need to explicitly tell copy_on_write about it by calling
T & r = x.write(); // write() performs the copy if needed
or, matching the use case of cow::cow_ptr<T>::apply:
This interface maps very nicely to dealing with value types: as long as
you're treating everything as a value (i.e. read-only), there aren't
any hidden costs of making a copy either. And as soon as you need to
make changes to the data, the overhead of the internal copy will be
visible in the code responsible of the mutations as well. I guess
that's enough to clear most concerns about the thread-safety issues too.
-- Pyry Jahkola pyry.jahkola_at_[hidden] https://twitter.com/pyrtsa
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk