Subject: Re: [boost] [Git] Documentation update
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-12 20:30:31
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on Tue Feb 12 2013, "Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr." <
> jeffrey.hellrung-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]>
> > [...]
> >> Is git for windows dead-simple to install yet?
> > I've always thought so.
> IMO it wasn't always dead-simple. Too many choices of what to install,
> confusing documentation about what you're actually getting with each
> choice, etc., were all problems. I feel safe recommending
> http://windows.github.com, though. I guess I should test it myself
> before being so confident...
Here is my experience on this.
I am a user of git who retrieve libraries and sometime patch them and
provide PR on GitHub and Bitbucket,
but I don't fully use git as I find Mercurial far more clear on the command
line interface (and TortoiseHg helps a lot too
but I suspect a future Windows release of SourceTree will change things
First I must say that git itself on windows is less obscure than it was few
years ago. Still, errors
Currently, I have 3 tools that deal with git:
- TortoiseGit (+MSysGit) : it install everything but git so you have to
install MSysGit first. Once done the GUI
is pretty much inspired fromg
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk