Subject: Re: [boost] [smart ptr] Any interest in copy-on-write pointer for C++11?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-13 12:43:01
Le 13/02/13 16:46, Ralph Tandetzky a écrit :
> * pointer-semantics or value-semantics and nullptr (brought up by
> - Should the COW-class be nullable? If not, then it should probably
> not be called cow_ptr.
> - This question has not been discussed to the end yet. Personally, I
> don't think that null-cow_ptrs are very useful.
> * Different member and non-member functions (brought up by Vincente)
> - relational operators (brought up by Vincente)
> - It is not clear, whether operator==() on cow_ptrs should only
> compare pointers or also pointees. This would depend on whether
> the COW-class is considered a pointer or a genuine value.
If you choose for your class to have value semantics the relational
operator should compare pointees.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk