Subject: Re: [boost] [range] [general] making member functions SFINAE-friendly
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-20 10:16:05
on Wed Feb 20 2013, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen-AT-dezide.com> wrote:
> Breaking the interface could be done, but I guess we would have 2 or
> three releases before it actually came into the code? What's the
> official Boost policy on this matter?
There isn't one.
-- Dave Abrahams
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk