Subject: Re: [boost] boost serialization backwards compatibility ofbinary archives broken
From: Markus Henschel (markus.henschel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-21 12:00:18
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Robert
> Sent: Donnerstag, 21. Februar 2013 17:36
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] boost serialization backwards compatibility ofbinary
> archives broken
> Markus Henschel wrote:
> > P.S.:
> > But what I find
> > strange is that you leave the bug reports open. If you have the
> > impression they cannot be fixed you could have just closed them with a
> > comment in there that nothing can be done.
> I left them open because I really wasn't sure what to say about them.
> One thing I left out in my original answer was that I tried to address this and it
> sort of made things worse. That is, when I "fixed" one case - another case
> broke. It was whack-a-mole.
> Sometimes the reporter isn't convinced by my answer and re-opens the
> report after I closed it. In order to avoid a war of closing/re-opening I just
> leave them open.
> Robert Ramey
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
You didn't comment any part of my mail that proposed a fix for compatibility of archives prior to 1.42. Does that mean that you consider this issue solved or will you look into that later?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk