Subject: Re: [boost] Review managers wanted for augmented data structures
From: Vadim Stadnik (vadimstdk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-03 07:29:18
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.boost_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> On 3 March 2013 11:03, Vadim Stadnik wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >> You've claimed the STL makes your containers "illegal" which is an odd
> >> claim that I can't agree with. Extending the STL with alternative
> >> containers is not just acceptable, I'm pretty sure it was intended by
> >> Stepanov et al.
> > I do not understand this statement. Because of ".. NOT just acceptable",
> > sounds like Stepanov et al. are responsible for STL being non-extendable,
> No that's the opposite of what it says. Try replacing "just" with
> "only" if that helps.
> What I said is that extending the STL is acceptable, and I believe it
> was intended by the designers.
This is important clarification.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk