Re: [boost] [compute] GPGPU Library - Request For Feedback

Subject: Re: [boost] [compute] GPGPU Library - Request For Feedback
From: Kyle Lutz (kyle.r.lutz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-06 21:14:55

On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Hartmut Kaiser
<hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I'd strongly suggest not to add <foo>_async_after(). All we need is
>
> a) a function/algorithm producing a future
> b) composable futures (see N3428,
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3428.pdf)
>
> But for this to be universally applicable we should try to find a way to
> converge onto ONE future type.

Very interesting, thanks for posting this. I'll take some time to
think on how best to integrate these concepts with Boost.Compute. And
yes, I would be very supporting of a generic and general solution.

-kyle