Subject: Re: [boost] boost::interprocess::unique_ptr vs Boost.SmartPtr
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-09 16:01:32
El 07/03/2013 23:16, Eric Niebler escribió:
> I think if the unique_ptr in interprocess doesn't depend on the rest of
> interprocess, or can be easily made stand-alone, then it should just be
> moved into smart_ptr. I don't want the smart_ptr library to depend on
> interprocess. That would be weird. Interprocess can then #include
> unique_ptr and import it into its namespace with a using directive for
> back compat.
I absolutely agree. I just can't find time to put unique_ptr into
SmartPtr. I think it might have some missing points so we might have to
complete it a bit.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk