Re: [boost] [gil] GIL_FORCEINLINE replaced with BOOST_FORCEINLINE?

Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] GIL_FORCEINLINE replaced with BOOST_FORCEINLINE?
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-12 16:54:17

On 12 March 2013 18:15, Christian Henning <chhenning_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> In boost/gil/gil_config.hpp, there is GIL_FORCEINLINE defined,
>> but there is no easy way to undef/redefine it.
>>
>> Would it be a good idea to replace GIL_FORCEINLINE with BOOST_FORCEINLINE
>> defined in boost/config/suffix.hpp?
>
>
> OK, will put it on my todo list.

Christian,

I was actually hoping to receive answer if it is a good idea at all.
Perhaps my understanding of purpose of BOOST_FORCEINLINE is biased.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net