Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] undocumented/unintended concept requirements in color_convert
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-19 10:18:51
> No I think this code is broken and shouldn't rely upon those features that
> aren't part of the concept.
> It should be possible to implement the color conversions without requiring
> the channel to be convertible to float.
You think we should use a rgb->cmyk conversion without floating point
> I'll see if I can come up with a patch for you.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk