Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] License of endian and limits in Boost detail
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-20 05:54:02

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:27 PM, Philip Bennefall <philip_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rene Rivera" <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [boost] License of endian and limits in Boost detail
> Added the documentation to the header now. And did some cleanup of the
> detection..
> Hi Rene,
> For my part, I would just like to thank you for taking on the task of fixing
> this problem. I hope that your Boost licensed solution can replace
> detail/endian.hpp as soon as possible so that there are no more licensing
> ambiguities.

Note that this probably not the only non-BSL part of Boost. Looking at
the inspection report and ignoring issues with tests, examples and
docs, at least the following files seem to have a different license:


There are a few nonessential and deprecated files that don't have a
license statement as well.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at