Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] numeric extensions pixel division.
From: Harg Tholan (hargtholan_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-26 09:42:23
That is what I mean, and we have something very similar
operations like addition, substraction of pixels, also for
multiplication and division by scalars too. But why not for division?
2013/3/26 Christian Henning <chhenning_at_[hidden]>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Harg Tholan <hargtholan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Hey,
> > It seems that in the numeric extensions it is implemented the division of
> > channels, but not the division of pixels. Are you planning to include it
> > some point?
> I'm not sure what the numeric extension has to do with division of
> When you say "division of pixel" do you mean the division of all
> channels in a pixel?
> you can do that like this:
> typedef rgb8_pixel_t pixel_t;
> pixel_t a( 10, 20, 30 );
> pixel_t b( 10, 20, 30 );
> static_for_each( a, b,  ( channel_type< pixel_t >::type& a
> , const channel_type< pixel_t >::type& b
> a /= b;
> } );
> Hope that helps,
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk