Subject: Re: [boost] required toolsets
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-28 09:50:18
On 03/27/2013 10:36 PM, Ben Pope wrote:
> The Intel compilers stand out as currently untested, so I guess it makes
> sense to drop them since nobody cares enough to run tests.
Yeah. There's one tester for trunk.
> Also last visible test run on AIX was 2008, and I can't see any runs for
> HP or SunOS.
The timestamp for the AIX tester is wrong.
The file timestamp is 2013-Mar-21 23:35:03.
> I say go for it... change it on trunk, observe, merge to release.
It doesn't actually matter, because at the moment,
the trunk files are being used to generate both
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk