Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Log: Any Comments? (Was: [log] Permission to merge to trunk)
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-30 06:53:50
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Klaim - Joël Lamotte <mjklaim_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Then I will write a brief summary of my point of view.
Thank you for your expanded review and your positive vote.
> Most of the issues I had were in v1 but they were not critical. Some were
> actually specific to the VC compilers and not specific to boost.log.
> I switched to V2 recently and seen no change other than the one I pointed
> in the previous thread (which are not big problems).
The last issue you reported was a missing Boost.Phoenix include, IIRC. Are
there other problems?
> One thing I'd like to see in the future is to have some helper code to
> setup multi-process logging.
Yes, inter-process logging is a very tempting course of further
development. It is an often requested feature.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk