Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] Ok to merge new gil's extension to release branch?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-02 10:21:03


On 04/02/2013 06:17 AM, Christian Henning wrote:
> I've committed this to the trunk and updated
>> Boost.IOStreams to use it.
> Thanks! I have taken a quick look and will add the changed to my jam file
> tonight. I think I still have to apply your changes to the other 3rd party
> jam file ( png, jpeg, and tiff ).
> Quick question:
> I usually compile 32bit and 64bit for both DEBUG and RELEASE
> configurations. How would I configure the binary name depending on the
> architecture and configuration? I imagine a naming convention like we do
> for the general boost libs.

Just copy what I did for Boost.IOStreams:
<build-name>boost_zlib <tag>@tag
(the tag rule is inherited from Jamroot)
Everything inside Boost needs to be consistent
about this.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at