Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of] Allow result_of to work with C++11 lambdas
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-10 13:39:34
On 10/04/13 19:27, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> If you are right and after the patch result_of would provide the best we
> can do now, why the user would need to define any of these macros?
Using decltype directly could offer a compile-time performance boost.
That's about it as far as I can tell.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk