Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of] Allow result_of to work with C++11 lambdas
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-10 18:26:27
On 10/04/13 20:09, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Do you mean that if a library author develops and tests with both
> compilers an even more at once he would need to define
> BOOST_RESULT_OF_USE_TR1 from the beginning even if defining
> BOOST_RESULT_OF_USE_DECTYPE works better on some compilers? But the
> library author cannot know how the users would define their Functors so
> it can not define these macros.
> I think that I need to re-read the result_of documentation to understand
> correctly what is proposed.
All configurations need to be tested. Testing just RESULT_OF_USE_TR1 is
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk