Subject: Re: [boost] [result_of] Allow result_of to work with C++11 lambdas
From: Nathan Crookston (nathan.crookston_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-12 03:20:06
Nathan Crookston wrote:
> Agreed. Hopefully I didn't take the discussion too far afield. The
> proposal is what you describe, and I believe the main impetus to accept it
> is so C++11 lambdas can be used in result_of expressions on compilers which
> have lacking lambdas.
Ugh. I meant "lacking decltype implementations."
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk