Re: [boost] Going forward with Boost.SIMD

Subject: Re: [boost] Going forward with Boost.SIMD
From: Marc Glisse (marc.glisse_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-20 07:03:08

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Mathias Gaunard wrote:

>> We have ?: for scalars, you
>> don't need to restrict yourself to a pure library
>
> Overloading ?: would probably have to be a standalone language extension to 
> core no?

Well, yes, it touches core, but there is a large difference between 
allowing one specific library type in ?: and letting users overload it as 
they please. Anyway, since standardization seems to be out, you can forget 
this comment.

-- 
Marc Glisse