Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Going forward with Boost.SIMD
From: Marc Glisse (marc.glisse_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-20 07:03:08

On Sat, 20 Apr 2013, Mathias Gaunard wrote:

>> We have ?: for scalars, you
>> don't need to restrict yourself to a pure library
> Overloading ?: would probably have to be a standalone language extension to
> core no?

Well, yes, it touches core, but there is a large difference between
allowing one specific library type in ?: and letting users overload it as
they please. Anyway, since standardization seems to be out, you can forget
this comment.

Marc Glisse

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at