Subject: Re: [boost] [config][mpl][type_traits][integer] BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT should use constexpr
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-21 11:45:53
>I'm not against this radical alternative, and I even like it. I don't know
>which compilers need the enum workaround and if Boost should support them.
The list seems to be:
VC7 and earlier
Vacpp 5.02 and earlier (currently 11.1)
Sunpro 5.6 and earlier.
MPW all versions?
>What I want is just that integral_constant use them so that all the traits
>in Boost conforms to the C++11 standard.
Out of curiosity, can you detect the difference? What can you do with
constexpr values that you can't with static const ones?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk