Re: [boost] [GSOC] proposal for Trie

Subject: Re: [boost] [GSOC] proposal for Trie
From: Michael Marcin (mike.marcin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-22 11:53:41

On 4/22/2013 10:55 AM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
> 2013/4/22 Michael Marcin <mike.marcin_at_[hidden]>:
>> On 4/22/2013 7:36 AM, Hardy wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for reviewing my proposal.
>>> I am very glad to see your positive reply.
>>> I have thought of what you say when writing my proposal.
>>> Since it will be a good addition, I will reorganize my initial
>>> conceivation about Trie and post it as soon as I could.
>>
>>
>> If possible implement it as a boost.intrusive container which generally
>> allows things to be trivially adapted into non-intrusive containers.
>
> It works both ways :)
> So do as *you* think would be better and more useful. (Nobody forbids
> you to implement it other way later and also propose to Boost)
>

You can take a non-intrusive container and make it intrusive?

Black magic?