Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [predef] Status and review results?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-23 02:52:45


On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Rene Rivera <grafikrobot_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Andrey Semashev <
> > andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> >> I noticed this in the docs:
> >>
> >> BOOST_ARCH_X86_64
> >> Intel IA-64 architecture.
> >>
> >> x86_64 (aka amd64 and Intel64), which is a widespread extension to IA32
> >> (x86),
> >> is not the same as IA64, which is implemented in Itanium CPUs. Could
> you,
> >> please, separate these two architectures?
> >>
> >
> > How weird.. They used to be separate. I must have gotten myself confused
> > in doing the X86_32/64 variants. I'll separate IA64 (as it was before).
> >
>
> That change is done.

Thanks, although BOOST_ARCH_X86_64 description still says "Intel
IA-64<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ia64>architecture.". It should
probably be "Intel64/AMD64 architecture." and
link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel64.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk