Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [operators] v2 test code
From: Andrew Ho (helloworld922_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-26 16:43:36

I have a prototype for boost.move integration done:

>From what I can tell, boost.move uses C++11 features if available, and if not,
uses a C++03 work-around (slight overhead if boost.move is used). I tested
with MinGW GCC 4.7.2 (-std=c++03 and -std=c++11) and VS2012. If no move
constructor is available, the code correctly resorts back to copy

One bonus of going this route is there are no compiler feature macro checks
required in boost.operators since boost.move already takes care of this.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at