Re: [boost] [operators] v2 test code

Subject: Re: [boost] [operators] v2 test code
From: Andrew Ho (helloworld922_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-26 16:43:36

I have a prototype for boost.move integration done:

http://codepad.org/O5LljVkn

>From what I can tell, boost.move uses C++11 features if available, and if not, 
uses a C++03 work-around (slight overhead if boost.move is used). I tested 
with MinGW GCC 4.7.2 (-std=c++03 and -std=c++11) and VS2012. If no move 
constructor is available, the code correctly resorts back to copy 
constructors.

One bonus of going this route is there are no compiler feature macro checks 
required in boost.operators since boost.move already takes care of this.