Subject: [boost] [any] Divergence between Boost.Any and standard library proposal
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-03 11:32:51
A fresh draft of the proposal is up at
In testing new any_cast examples, Boost.Any is handling one case
differently from the proposal:
x = "Meow"; // x holds const char*
This works fine with the Adobe implementation, but with the Boost
implementation g++ 4.7.0 -std=c++11 reports:
In file included from any_cast_test.cpp:5:0:
c:\boost\trunk/boost/any.hpp: In instantiation of
onst ValueType&) [with ValueType = char ]':
c:\boost\trunk/boost/any.hpp:52:49: required from
'boost::any::any(const ValueType&) [wi
th ValueType = char ]'
c:\boost\trunk/boost/any.hpp:124:13: required from 'boost::any&
lueType&&) [with ValueType = const char (&); boost::any = boost::any]'
any_cast_test.cpp:79:7: required from here
c:\boost\trunk/boost/any.hpp:169:27: error: array used as initializer
VC++ 2012 gets the same error, albeit with a much longer set of messages.
AFAICS, the Adobe (and the proposed standard) behavior is preferred.
The type does need to decay.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk