Re: [boost] [gsoc 2013] draft proposal for chrono::date

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc 2013] draft proposal for chrono::date
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-05 05:26:30

Le 05/05/13 00:15, Anurag Kalia a écrit :
> OTOH, the different day formats are actually followed in different 
> countries, according to that useful link by Howard. My suggestion is 
> to use ISo ordering only in functions like date() or make_date(). But 
> when using slash, as in: date d = day(25) / dec / 2013; It is very 
> natural to me. Here in my part of world, d-m-y is the dominant format. 
> Otherwise use of '/' itself is of no much use.
I guess that make_date would be less conflicting than operator/() 
expressions on a C++ proposal to the standard.
So the proposal should include make_date.  I like however the 
operator/() expressions also.

Best,
Vicente