Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc 2013] draft proposal for chrono::date
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-05 15:07:27
Le 05/05/13 20:36, Anurag Kalia a écrit :
> This is a domain where dates by themselves are completely unsuitable. If
> there is deep flaw in my reasoning, I don't know. But the talk of using or
> not using time zones because they are unsuitable for maintenance seems to
> miss a big point.
Anurag, if we were to include timezones in Boost.Chrono/Date we wil call
it Boost.Chrono/DateTime ;-) And the precision of a date_time would be
whatever we need it to be.
I'm not interested in this possible Boost.Chrono/DateTime.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk