Re: [boost] [iterator] Silent-but-deadly bug in iterator_facade category

Subject: Re: [boost] [iterator] Silent-but-deadly bug in iterator_facade category
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-07 03:07:20

> In my experience, the easiest way to handle this painful reference
> requirement is to ignore it and pretend that the standard categories are
> only about traversal. I've never had anything break because of this.

Is the OP's problem not an example of pretending that the standard
iterator categories are only about traversal and having something 
break as a result?

Regards,
Nate