Subject: Re: [boost] [1.54.0][release] Provisional schedule
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-07 06:38:09
On 7 May 2013 11:27, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> What are the worst dates for release? December-January, C++Now - May,
> July-August, ...
I think the schedule was actually picked to avoid certain disruptions.
I don't know how it works out for C++Now participants.
> Maybe we should have 3 releases a year: I would suggest begin of
> February/June/October or begin of Mars/July/November.
> Having 4 moth would let enough time to add new libraries or major changes
> and have a long period for the beta release so that the release contains
> less bugs.
FWIW I've suggested a 4 month cycle before, but I think others
consider it too infrequent.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk