Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono/date] conversion between concrete dates
From: Roland Bock (rbock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-11 13:47:37
On 2013-05-11 17:32, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
>> 11.Mai 2013
>> There are just so many ways.
> We need to choose one of the overloaded operators.
Again, maybe I missed some earlier requirement, but I don't see the
need. Don't get me wrong. Overloading is wonderful. But in this case, I
don't see the point.
>> Allowing such formats in code just adds to
>> confusion, IMHO.
> Why are you confused. Even if I don't use to use May/11/2013 but
> 11/May/2013 I don't see how
> auto dt = may/11/year(2013);
> could confuse someone. What could this mean other than the declaration
> of a date.
Maybe "confuse" is too strong. But it does not help readability, if
dates can be written in different styles (except for the author at that
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk