Subject: Re: [boost] [1.54.0][release] Provisional schedule
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-12 07:41:56
On 12 May 2013 12:31, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 05/12/2013 06:32 AM, Daniel James wrote:
>> On 12 May 2013 10:17, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Just wanted to ask about the delay you were talking about. What is the updated
>>> schedule of the release and deadlines? The current schedule states that the
>>> deadline for new libs is tomorrow.
>> I'll leave the deadline as it is, but tti and log have extra time.
>> Say, a week (but hopefully you won't need a week...). If I extend the
>> deadline then there's the possibility of another library popping up on
>> Wednesday, which I don't want to deal with.
> Another week is more than enough for tti, but it is appreciated. Even if
> I cannot find workarounds for Intel C++ problems or Sun C++ problems
> supporting gcc, clang, and vc++ completely was always my goal.
> Are purely documentation changes allowed after the deadline you set ?
Yes. Once in release, you just follow the same process as everything
else. Documentation changes are always allowed apart from when the
release branch is frozen to build a release.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk