Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [any][quickbook] Recent compile failure gcc vs. clang..
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-13 09:15:58

On 13 May 2013 11:01, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 11/05/13 21:14, Daniel James wrote:
>> But regardless, I'm not sure how well gcc 4.2 will be supported in the
>> future. It's a pretty old compiler.
> Regardless of whether GCC 4.2 should be supported or not, in C++03 T& is
> invalid if T is already a reference.

Nobody was suggesting it was an incorrect error. And I've already
pointed out, I was referring to quickbook.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at