Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-13 12:26:38
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Michael Marcin <mike.marcin_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Does boost ever claim support for abi compatibility with different
> compiler settings? I thought not.
I thought boost explicitely, somewhere, stated that binary compatibility is
not a requirement for libraries.
I remember it being the main argument for developing "booster" which is a
"fixed" set of boost libraries used in CPPCMS.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk