Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries
From: Charles_J_Wilson_at_[hidden]
Date: 2013-05-13 17:33:51

Next message: Sergey Cheban: "Re: [boost] Embedding manifest into the regression tests (was: [testers] [log] Problems with tests)"
Previous message: Sergey Cheban: "Re: [boost] Embedding manifest into the regression tests (was: [testers] [log] Problems with tests)"
In reply to: Andrey Semashev: "[boost] C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries"
Next in thread: Petr Machata: "Re: [boost] C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries"

> I would like to hear opinions on the possible course of action to tackle this problem. Currently, I see 2 choices:

> 1. Avoid using C++11 features in binary interfaces.

> 2. Compile different versions of Boost libraries, for each supported C++ version.

> Opinions?

We use option 2 and rely on the names being well-formed.

Charles Wilson
Senior Software Development Engineer
Dell | Enterprise Solutions Group

Next message: Sergey Cheban: "Re: [boost] Embedding manifest into the regression tests (was: [testers] [log] Problems with tests)"
Previous message: Sergey Cheban: "Re: [boost] Embedding manifest into the regression tests (was: [testers] [log] Problems with tests)"
In reply to: Andrey Semashev: "[boost] C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries"
Next in thread: Petr Machata: "Re: [boost] C++03 and C++11 ABI compatibility for compiled libraries"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk