Subject: Re: [boost] [Fusion] another nil issue
From: Rich E (reakinator_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-22 19:01:47
Is there anyone on this list responsible for Boost.Fusion, or interested in
it working on Mac OS X? The silence is somewhat disconcerting..
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Rich E <reakinator_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I just attached this patch to the 2 year old ticket here:
> Is it possible that this could be reviewed and included in 1.54? Our
> users constantly run into obscure compiler issues related to this nil
> symbol conflict, furthermore we would like to use Boost.Log in 1.54 but
> won't be able to without this simple change.
> Thanks for your time,
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Rich E <reakinator_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I see there was work about 5 months ago to avoid the Obj-C++ nameclash
>> with nil in Boost.Fusion:
>> Thanks for that as there are alot of use using boost in this scenario.
>> However, I have found another couple nameclashes that prevented me from
>> linking against Boost.Log in the latest trunk on OS X with clang, when
>> trying this sample code:
>> Attached is the changeset I needed to make to build. Does this seem
>> acceptable to the maintainers?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk