Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] SIMD implementation of uBLAS
From: Nasos Iliopoulos (nasos_i_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-29 09:04:49

it would be better of uBLAS specific discussions are kept into the uBLAS
mailing list rather than the Boost one, unless of course your post is of
a more general nature that needs exposure to the wider Boost community.

Thank you!

On 05/29/2013 07:36 AM, Aditya Atluri wrote:
> On Wed May 29 2013 04:35:05 PM IST, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 29/05/13 12:46, Aditya Avinash wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Mathias Gaunard <
>>> mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>> Ok, in that case, you need to first study how uBlas works.
>>>> For example if you write something along the lines of
>>>> a = trans(b + c) * d;
>>>> AFAIK what uBlas does is something like
>>>> for(size_t i=0; i!=sz.height; ++i)
>>>> for(size_t j=0; j!=sz.width; ++j)
>>>> a[i][j] = (b[j][i] + c[j][i]) * d[i][j];
>>>> What you need to do is change the loop structure and modify the
>>>> evaluation of all nodes involved to support SIMD.
>>>> Of course trans is going to be a problem.
>>>> Thankfully uBlas doesn't have that many functions, so trans and herm
>>>> are the only functions that exhibit that issue.
>>> Should i write SIMD code for the algorithm. Or, as there is no such
>>> function in uBLAS, do you want me to develop CPU code (function)??
>> There is no algorithm here. It's just the evaluation of a uBlas matrix
>> expression template.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> Ok. Shall i start writing SIMD code for it?
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at