Subject: Re: [boost] [git] Library metadata
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-04 15:06:30
On 4 June 2013 19:57, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I think it's a great idea. But in a modularized setup, where would the
> category definitions go?
I'm not sure. Maybe in the super module, or perhaps a separate repo
which could also contain things like helper scripts and the library
template that was proposed elsewhere (i.e. things for developers that
won't be included in the release).
I haven't really thought it through yet. I just want to make sure I'm
not going to step on anyone's toes, and that anything I do is
compatible with other efforts.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk