Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] [assert] Proposal for a new assert macro which stores the failed values ("informative assert")
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-07 16:24:22
On Friday 07 June 2013 14:36:13 you wrote:
> On Friday 07 June 2013 12:16:49 Krzysztof Czainski wrote:
> > So should there be a guideline to use the BOOST_ASSERT( expr || !"msg" )
> > idiom instead of BOOST_ASSERT_MSG, when msg is only a string literal, or
> > how should this problem be addressed?
> IMHO, BOOST_ASSERT_MSG should be optimized, and this is possible to do while
> keeping the current interface. If
> boost::assertion::detail::assertion_failed_msg is defined to be never
> inlined, and the checked condition is marked so that it is unlikely to be
> true, then this would solve the problems I mentioned. This will probably
> require adding BOOST_NOINLINE and BOOST_LIKELY/BOOST_UNLIKELY macros to
> Boost.Config though.
> I can do this a bit later, if noone objects.
Please, report any issues you encounter with this change.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk