Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a library for actor programming?
From: David Sankel (camior_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-11 19:40:15
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:31 PM, james <james_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 13:03, Brandon Kohn wrote:
>> On 6/10/2013 4:30 PM, james wrote:
>>> I don't think that the limited correctness you get from that is very
>>> useful in a concurrent system.
>> Why not? I think the development crews that worked on the mars orbiter
>> mission which failed would beg to differ.
> [I]t all goes back to schema evolution, and that's why systems like
> protobuf tend to sacrifice clean syntax for extensibility..
I think that goes back to my original point. For a large subset of users,
schema evolution is a non-issueâthe entire system is deployed at once. A
Boost.Actor library should have a good story for these users IMO.
As an aside, the whole concept of 'schema evolution' has really piqued my
curiosity. Is there some academic key-word I can search with to learn more
about data structure evolution in systems that need to maintain some kind
of backwards compatibility?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk