Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [c++11]
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-15 04:15:38

> On 14 June 2013 17:21, Niall Douglas <ndouglas_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> So here's the question: is C++03 compiler and C++03 TR1 standard library
>> support still an absolute, unnegotiable requirement for a library to
>> become
>> an official part of Boost?
> No.

I suspect this may come down to the review ultimately: I can imagine that
any library that was C++11 only would have a hard time getting through
review "as is", *unless* there's a really compelling reason for it to be
that way (and for some libraries that may well be the case). However, I can
also imagine a library being developed as a C++11 only lib and only ported
back to C++03 and/or less capable compilers once it's stable (or vice


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at