Re: [boost] [test]enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?

Subject: Re: [boost] [test]enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?
From: Richard (legalize+jeeves_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-15 15:17:31

[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]

boost_at_[hidden] spake the secret code
<1371148674.45851.YahooMailNeo_at_[hidden]> thusly:

>> Christopher Kormanyos <e_float <at> yahoo.com> writes:
>
>
>>> * OK for GCC 4.7.2
>>> * Errors for VC10 (ambiguous symbols), AKA VisualStudio 2010
>>> * Errors for VC11 (ambiguous symbols), AKA VisualStudio 2012
>
>>Sorry. I've misinterpreted MSVC output. I do see the error now. And... this 
>>is really weird one. I did not see something like this in a long time. What 
>>it comes to can be illustrated in this example:
>
><snip code sample>
>
>>I'm sure it can be simplified further by removing specifics of 
>>multiprecision library. And the offending line is ... the template 
>>instantiation, in unrelated namespace HAS NOTHING TO DO with enable_if at 
>>all. 
>
>So if I understand, we are actually dealing with a compiler
>issue here regarding the proper resolution of namespaces.
>Is that what you are saying?

If that is the case, you need a file a bug on <http://connect.microsoft.com>,
or use the VS 2012 Feedback Tool to report the problem from inside VS 2012:
<http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/f8a5aac8-0418-4f88-9d34-bdbe2c4cfe72?SRC=VSIDE>
-- 
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
     The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
         The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
  Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>