Subject: Re: [boost] ï»¿ï»¿ï»¿[test]enable_if, etc. : wasï»¿ : ï»¿...multiprecision types ... for unitï»¿ tests?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-17 17:52:07
Christopher Kormanyos <e_float <at> yahoo.com> writes:
> >I hope we can find a workaround. Compiler's behavior is very strange, but
> >there should be some triggers for it. Maybe we can avoid them.
> Let's see what John thinks of decorating the names in
> multiprecision. He did not sound too enthused in our
> preliminary discussions.
I was talking about workaround in Boost.Test code. The problem really comes
from template instantiation in some other unrelated piece of code. If you
can figure out what exactly triggers this bug maybe we can find a way to
write the code differently.
P.S. I suspect simply removing using statements from boost::itest namespace
and using fully qualified names for boost::unit_test symbols would do the
trick. Unless we can find "nicer" solution I can do the change.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk