Subject: Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?
From: Paul Long (plong_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-29 22:32:37
On 6/29/2013 10:04 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
> There are plenty of little endian only contexts that would want to
> avoid the host->network->host conversions for all transfers.
..and that's one reason why support for little endian is now planned
I'd like to localize the endianess behavior so that a consumer could
even define an otherwise unsupported endianess via, for example,
overloading a single function.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk