Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?

Subject: Re: [boost] Any interest in bitstream class?
From: Paul Long (plong_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-29 22:32:37

On 6/29/2013 10:04 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
> There are plenty of little endian only contexts that would want to 
> avoid the host->network->host conversions for all transfers.

..and that's one reason why support for little endian is now planned 
(https://github.com/dplong/bstream/wiki/To-do).

I'd like to localize the endianess behavior so that a consumer could 
even define an otherwise unsupported endianess via, for example, 
overloading a single function.

Paul