Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a 'Boost.property' library?
From: Evgeny Panasyuk (evgeny.panasyuk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-07 14:05:09
07.07.2013 18:04, Metodi Todorov:
> Example: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cproperty/?source=dlp
1. Your property_rw, property_ro, property_wo have implicitly declared
copy constructor and copy assignment operator, which have wrong semantic
- they copy "this", while it must be tied to enveloping object.
2. FYI: I saw somewhere (maybe at stackoverflow) following C++11
approach for properties:
(cout << "getter" << endl; return value_;),
(cout << "setter" << endl; value_ = x;)
> Is there any interest of "C# property" like library?
Personally, I don't remember if I ever need properties. Though, it is
possible that there are some application domains where they are needed.
I think such kind of property library should be mature and provide
convenient interface, in order to be accepted into Boost.
-- Evgeny Panasyuk
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk