Subject: Re: [boost] [function] Bind to std::function if supported?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-09 02:21:50
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Andrew Ho <helloworld922_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I haven't looked at boost::atomic yet, but we could also consider similar
> bindings to std::atomic if the library doesn't already do so.
std::atomic is also slightly different from boost::atomic (or rather,
std::atomic_flag from boost::atomic_flag). Also, boost::atomic is
better optimized than std::atomic on gcc prior to 4.7 and std::atomic
cannot be used with structs with gcc prior to 4.8. Not sure what is
the state of affairs on MSVC and other compilers.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk