Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] radix sort
From: Jeremy Murphy (jeremy.william.murphy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-11 06:10:04


I'm quite interested. I was going to do it myself, but I'm quite happy to
work with someone, help out, whatever.

Jeremy

On 11 July 2013 18:32, Steven Ross <spreadsort_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I implemented a templated hybrid-radix sort that is faster than O(Nlog(N))
> and is awaiting review. Are you looking for a pure radix sort, which tends
> to be slower?
> On Jul 11, 2013 4:13 AM, "Sourav" <souravatboost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > I wanted to know if someone is/was working on Radix Sort or not.
> I
> > did check the SoC listings and did not see radix sort in the list.
> >
> > If no one is working, may someone help me provide some pointers/details
> as
> > to what the expectation is with regards to Radix sort for boost ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Sourav
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Unsubscribe & other changes:
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk