Subject: [boost] [Operators] empty_base should be untemplated?
From: Andrew Ho (helloworld922_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-18 18:19:30
I've noticed about the empty_base class is that it's templated with type T,
and I don't think it should be.
Fyi, the empty_base class is there to turn multiple inheritance into a single
inheritance chain (due to compiler deficiencies/object size bloat on at least
I don't see why this empty_base should be templated, and it would be better
suited if it wasn't since all I can think it does is make the compiler work
harder. Does anyone know why it was templated to begin with? Additionally, are
we safe to change empty_base to be not use templates?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk