Subject: Re: [boost] Patch bonanza for VS2013 Preview support
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-24 19:23:10
> A clang developer has recently pointed me to an interesting clause in the
> standard ([temp.inst] p6):
> "If the overload resolution process can determine the correct function to
> call without instantiating a class template definition, it is
> unspecified whether that instantiation actually takes place."
> Perhaps this is coming into play here (and thus all of the above
> behaviour is standard-conforming)?
That's an excellent catch. Yep, I agree.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk