Re: [boost] [utility] [swap] How about Boost.Move?

Subject: Re: [boost] [utility] [swap] How about Boost.Move?
From: Evgeny Panasyuk (evgeny.panasyuk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-07-25 10:15:55

25.07.2013 17:44, Antony Polukhin:

> So, what do the community think about such optimization?

I thought that was already done :) (however, never relied on it)
I think if it is transparent change - then it should be done. If not - 
then maybe introduce new "move-emulation-aware" swap?

P.S. What about one step further? Move-aware algorithms, like 
std::rotate? What about C++11 algorithm improvements, like return 
iterator at std::rotate, std::fill_n, like std::partition for Forward 
iterators/ranges?
( by the way, just reported bug about boost::partition 
https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8927 )

-- 
Evgeny Panasyuk