Re: [boost] [timer] May I apply trivial fix?

Subject: Re: [boost] [timer] May I apply trivial fix?
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-02 07:19:27

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Andrey Semashev
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 10:26 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [timer] May I apply trivial fix?
> 
> On Friday 02 August 2013 12:52:56 Antony Polukhin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As far as I know Beman is almost always busy, so may I apply trivial
> > fix described in this ticket https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/8956 ?
> >
> > This fix is essential for running regression tests with Intel compiler.
> 
> I recently made a workaround in Boost.Test for this problem [1] but I simply dropped noncopyable
and
> replaced it with deleted functions. I wonder if there's any need for noncopyable now besides
backward
> compatibility.
> 
> [1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/85187

Backward compatibility is important for this noncopyable.

(And the BOOST_DEFAULTED_FUNCTION is ugly and its function is less obvious).

I vote for this fix.

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow,
Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB  UK
[phone]  07714330204
pbristow_at_[hidden]