Re: [boost] [timer] May I apply trivial fix?

Subject: Re: [boost] [timer] May I apply trivial fix?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-03 15:45:55

AMDG

On 08/02/2013 03:33 PM, Agustín K-ballo Bergé wrote:
> <snip>
> Doesn't a defaulted function get the access level it would get if
> implicitly declared? In C++11 mode the singleton constructor and
> destructor would be public. At least gcc-4.8.1 thinks so:
> http://ideone.com/FSXqeX
> 
> <snip>
> 
> [dcl.fct.def.default]/4:
> Explicitly-defaulted functions and implicitly-declared functions are
> collectively called defaulted functions, and the implementation shall
> provide implicit definitions for them (12.1 12.4, 12.8), which might
> mean defining them as deleted. (...)
> 
> [class.ctor]/4: A default constructor for a class X is a constructor of
> class X that can be called without an argument. If there is no
> user-declared constructor for class X, a constructor having no
> parameters is implicitly declared as defaulted (8.4). An
> implicitly-declared default constructor is an inline **public** member
> of its class. (...)
> 

I don't see it.  This paragraph says nothing about
explicitly defaulted functions.  It very clearly
states that it applies to *implicitly-declared*
default constructors

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe